Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Vb Pc 33Accepting Two or Three Bowls Full

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dvittipattapūrapaṭiggahaṇa

📖303 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Sutta on Accepting Two or Three Bowls of Rice

Context

This sutta appears in the Pācittiya section of the Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka, the part that regulates lighter faults in the Buddhist path of practice. Pācittiya offenses are faults requiring confession and correction for spiritual purification. The context of the sutta concerns bhikkhus accepting food from laypeople during the daily almsround.

The Buddha established this rule to protect the purity of the Sangha as well as the lay donors who aroused the mind of giving. When bhikkhus accept too much rice or food in their bowls, this may create misunderstandings, raising doubts about their intentions and the nature of the almsgoing life. This rule is intended to maintain restraint, humility, and propriety in strengthening the relationship between bhikkhus and laypeople.

Main Content

According to Dvittipattapūrapaṭiggahaṇa (the fault of accepting two or three bowls full), a bhikkhu should not accept more than two or three full bowls of rice from a single layperson. If the bhikkhu accepts more food than this prescribed amount, it is a Pācittiya fault, which he must confess before the Sangha or before another bhikkhu in order to be restored.

The intention of this rule is clear: limiting the number of bowls of rice expresses non-greed and not becoming overly dependent on one particular layperson. This helps the bhikkhu practice almsgoing properly, moving from house to house, so that the generosity of all laypeople receives appreciation and is not regarded as “begged food” from a fixed source. This action also protects laypeople from the misunderstanding that they are responsible for providing fully for a particular bhikkhu, thereby maintaining fairness within the Sangha community.

This rule is especially important in the context of Theravāda Buddhism, where self-sufficiency in almsgoing is regarded as a basic element of pure practice.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.