Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Pm Pc 86Upholstery

Pāli / Sanskrit:Tūlonaddha

📖741 words · ~3 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This entry has been rewritten from the descriptive information: code Xct Mu Bu Pm Pc 86, Vietnamese title “Padding,” English title “Upholstery,” Pali title “Tūlonaddha,” belonging to Comparative Vinaya in the tradition of Sectarian Buddhist Scriptures. The data has only the truncated ending of the Vietnamese text, which speaks of pillows, mattresses, requisites outside the rule, luxurious materials, splendid decoration, simplicity, and the danger of attachment. There is no full source text for comparison, so the precise materials, dimensions, method of making, conditions of use, or classification of the offense cannot be confirmed.

Context

Monastic life is built on the principles of fewness of wishes and contentment. A practitioner still needs basic requisites to maintain life and health, but does not make comfort the goal. Therefore, the Vinaya often concerns very ordinary objects: robes, bedding, living requisites, ways of receiving, and ways of using. Such matters seem small, but it is precisely there that craving can take hold.

The title “Padding” and the word “Tūlonaddha” in the descriptive information show that the content is connected with an object used for lying down, sitting, padding, or covering. The English title “Upholstery” suggests stuffing, covering, or cushioning, but because the full text is unavailable, one should not determine exactly what kind of mattress it is, what material it is made from, or what technical rule applies. What can be said with certainty is that this entry belongs to a group of rules concerning requisites and the simple way of life of monastics.

Content That Can Be Determined From the Descriptive Information

From the truncated ending, the preceding content had explained that monastics should not possess or use pillows or mattresses outside the rule, especially those made of luxurious materials or with splendid decoration. The stated purpose is to help maintain simplicity and not allow body and mind to be governed by the desire for comfort.

A basic direction of meaning can be determined: Vinaya discipline does not deny the need for rest, but places that need within limits appropriate to the holy life. Sleeping places and cushions should serve health and the stability needed for practice, not become objects of display, accumulation, enjoyment, or distinction between luxury and poverty.

The truncated passage contains one place using the phrase “four requirements,” but the data is insufficient to determine the exact term the earlier writer intended. Therefore, this explanation preserves only the broad meaning: the basic material needs of the life of practice should be managed with mindfulness and contentment. One should not automatically correct it into a specific doctrinal term without comparing the source.

Meaning for Practice

The meaning for practice in this entry lies in recognizing that craving does not cling only to great possessions. A soft mattress, a beautiful cushion, an overly cultivated comfort can also become a place where the mind seeks, protects, and compares. When the mind becomes accustomed to demanding comfort, it has difficulty abiding in simplicity; when the body is indulged excessively, the will for practice may become weak.

The discipline concerning requisites is not intended to make the body suffer. Buddhist teaching does not regard blind harshness as liberation. But between proper care of the body and the growth of indulgence there is a boundary that needs to be illuminated. A monastic uses requisites as means, not as extensions of self. Padding lets the body rest, but should not let the mind lie down in attachment.

For laypeople, this entry also has contemplative value. Although they do not live by monastic Vinaya, Buddhist practitioners can still ask themselves: are the daily comforts helping me live more wakefully, or making me more dependent? Simplicity is not poverty; it is the ability to use enough, to know where to stop, and not to let the quality of life be measured by the degree of enjoyment.

Comparative Note

When the full text is compared, it will be necessary to verify exactly what kind of requisite “padding” refers to here, whether there are any conditions permitting use because of illness, age, climate, or practical need, and how the rule determines the level of violation. It will also be necessary to verify terms related to materials and methods of making before interpreting further. The present version is only an AI explanation based on descriptive information and the truncated ending, intended to preserve a cautious spirit and not to replace a full Vinaya translation or commentary.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.