Xct Mu Bi Pc 46Intentionally Killing Living Creatures
Pāli / Sanskrit:Sañcicca
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Sañcicca Discourse: Intentionally Killing Living Beings
Background
The Sañcicca discourse, intentional killing, is a rule belonging to the Pātimokkha, the basic code of discipline in the early Buddhist tradition. The Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka records the rules of practice that the Buddha established for the community of monks and nuns in order to govern the monastery and support diligent practice by bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs.
This rule is placed among the first group of Pātimokkha rules, the most serious violations leading to exclusion from monastic life if committed. Sañcicca (sañ + cicca) means “an action performed with intention,” emphasizing the mental factor, the key that distinguishes offense in the Buddha-Dharma. This is not accidental or unintentional action, but killing carried out with clear volition.
The historical background shows that the Buddha required bhikkhus to cultivate the intention to protect life, because Buddhist practice is the path of compassion and is incompatible with slaughtering living beings. The Vinaya rules are carefully structured, clearly distinguishing between culpable and non-culpable violations based on the factor of intention.
Main Content
Sañcicca Pācittiya (Xct Mu Bi Pc 46) prescribes that if a bhikkhu intentionally and personally kills a living being (sato pāṇaṃ jīvita voropeti), that person commits a Pācittiya offense, a serious violation requiring public confession to the Sangha.
The key point here is sato, “with mindfulness” or “knowingly,” indicating clear intention. The act must be the result of a deliberate decision, not carelessness or accident. The Vinaya Piṭaka records in detail: if a bhikkhu administers poison, uses a weapon, or employs any means to kill a living being, from a small insect to a larger creature, and does so with the clear intention of killing it, this is a Pācittiya offense.
An important distinction: if the death caused by the act was not the main intention but only a secondary result, the degree of violation may be lighter or there may be no offense.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.