Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bi Pm Pc 118Getting Laywomen to Massage

Pāli / Sanskrit:Gihinī-ummaddāpana

📖273 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Gihinī-ummaddāpana Sutta: The Matter of Massage by Laywomen

Background

This disciplinary passage is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha of the Bhikkhunī Sangha, recorded in the Theravāda tradition. It reflects the detailed regulations established by the Buddha to maintain discipline and prevent situations that might offend moral conduct or create misunderstandings in society.

The context of this Pātimokkha rule arose when incidents occurred involving nuns or bhikkhunīs taking part in massage activities with laywomen. In the society of the Buddha’s time, this could create misunderstandings or cause discomfort for the parties involved. Therefore, the Buddha laid down a rule to prevent such cases, protecting the reputation and independence of the Sangha as well as the respect of lay followers.

Main Content

This rule prohibits female monastics (bhikkhunīs) from requesting or permitting laywomen (gihinī) to massage them. Specifically, if a nun asks a laywoman to massage her, or if the nun herself performs rubbing or massage without a legitimate medical reason, that is an act of transgression.

The reason for establishing this rule is not merely to protect formal discipline. Rather, the Buddha saw that such actions could lead to unnecessary bodily closeness between monastics and laypeople, which might arouse unwholesome states of mind (akusala-citta). Moreover, asking laypeople to perform such tasks could be misunderstood as a monastic’s abusing religious authority for personal service, contrary to the principles of humble living (appamāda) and freedom from seeking gain (anattasiṅsa).

This rule is classified in the Pātimokkha as either a Pācittiya, an offense requiring public confession, or a Sekhiya, a training rule, depending on the details of the specific action.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.