Mpt Np 6Asking an Unrelated Person for Robes
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aññātakaviññatti
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Asking an Unrelated Person for Robes — Aññātakaviññatti
(Mpt Np 6 · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit · Sectarian Scriptures · Comparative)
---
Source Status
This item belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit, number Mpt Np 6, recorded in the corpus of sectarian comparative materials with the Vietnamese title Asking an Unrelated Person for Robes, the English title Asking an Unrelated Person for Robes, and the Sanskrit-Pāli title Aññātakaviññatti. The full Sanskrit source text corresponding to this item has not yet been directly compared in the current database.
Therefore, the explanation below is not a translation of the original scripture, but a general presentation based on the descriptive information provided combined with general understanding of the genre of disciplinary rules in sectarian Buddhist traditions. Readers are encouraged to consult original Vinaya texts from authoritative scholarly sources for accurate comparison.
---
Background
Aññātakaviññatti is a Pāli compound of aññātaka (an unrelated person, a stranger, one with no blood or marriage relation) and viññatti (request, solicitation, the act of stating one’s need). Together, the term denotes the act of a bhikkhu asking for robes or robe cloth from someone who is not a relative.
In the general structure of the Vinaya Piṭakas of the schools, rules related to robes (cīvara) are usually placed in the Nissaggiya Pācittiya group, that is, rules in which a violation requires both forfeiture of the offending item and confession before the Sangha. The code Np 6 in this item’s designation clearly suggests that it belongs to the sixth Nissaggiya training rule in the set being compared among schools.
The Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit is a work compiling and comparing Vinaya texts preserved in Sanskrit from various schools. The purpose of this kind of text is to identify similarities and differences in how the schools developed and systematized the precepts, serving scholarly comparative research as well as reference for Sangha practice.
---
Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information
Based on the title and designation, the main features of this training rule can be identified:
Object of regulation: The rule concerns the conduct of a bhikkhu who actively asks for robes, kāṣāya garments, robe cloth, or clothing used in the life of practice, from laypeople or donors with whom he has no family relation.
Reason for the rule: In the spirit of the Vinaya Piṭaka, a bhikkhu is regarded as one who lives by natural receiving, meaning that he receives only when donors freely give, and does not actively solicit, in order to avoid burdening laypeople and to preserve the noble bearing of one who has gone forth. The usual exception is relatives, those connected by blood or marriage, because they have a natural responsibility toward their kin and asking within this sphere is not regarded as harassment or exploitation of the kindness of outsiders.
Exceptional situations: In many Vinaya versions, the equivalent training rule often includes provisions for special circumstances, such as when a bhikkhu has lost his robes or had them stolen, cases in which asking an unrelated person for robes is permitted within certain limits. However, because the Sanskrit text has not been compared, the specific details of this version must be confirmed directly from the source.
Sectarian character: The designation Mpt in the identifying code (san-mu-mpt-bu-pm-np6) suggests that this text belongs within a specific school in the comparative system, but the descriptive information does not explicitly name the school, so it cannot be asserted on textual grounds that this is Mūlasarvāstivāda or another tradition.
---
Meaning for Practice
The training rule Aññātakaviññatti contains a profound principle of practice: self-respect and contentment in the holy life. One who has gone forth does not place himself in a position of expectation or demand toward outsiders, because that is an expression of craving and lack of fewness of wishes.
Furthermore, this rule protects the healthy relationship between the Sangha and the lay community. When a bhikkhu asks strangers, it can easily create psychological pressure, causing laypeople to give even when they do not freely wish to do so, thereby blurring the boundary between generosity and being solicited, and damaging the reputation of the Sangha jewel.
From the perspective of meditation practice, keeping this rule also nurtures the mind of letting go: the bhikkhu learns to accept his present condition, even if lacking, without using social relations to compensate by asking from strangers. This is a concrete practice of santuṭṭhi (contentment, knowing enough), one of the qualities highly praised in Buddhist monastic life.
---
Comparative Note
The Sanskrit text corresponding to Mpt Np 6 has not yet been directly compared within the current materials. This explanation is based entirely on the descriptive information provided and cannot replace reading the original text. Researchers or practitioners wishing to understand the matter accurately should consult scholarly editions of Sanskrit Vinaya texts from authoritative Buddhist studies institutes, while also comparing equivalent versions in the Pāli Vinaya and Chinese canon in order to gain a comprehensive view of this training rule in its multi-sectarian context.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.