Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Np 13A New Blanket Should Have Mixed Colors

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dvebhāga

📖301 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Dvebhāga Sutta

A New Robe Must Have Two Colors

Background

The Dvebhāga Sutta is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, especially in the Pātimokkha, the code of rules, within the fivefold Pāli collection, in the branch concerning rules on robe stores (Cīvara-khandhaka). This is part of the sacred discipline established by Śākyamuni Buddha for the community of monks and nuns in order to maintain moral discipline and harmony in the monastery.

This discourse was recorded in the context of early Buddhist monks often receiving gifts from laypeople, including robes (stores, cīvara). However, in order to avoid pride, display, and entanglement in material things, the Buddha laid down detailed rules on how the robes that bhikkhus used were to be handled and made. The rule concerning "two colors" (dvebhāga) is one concrete expression of this principle of modesty and practicality.

Main Content

According to the Dvebhāga rule, when a monk receives a new robe from a layperson, it must be treated in a special way. The discourse prescribes that this new robe must not be kept intact in its freshness and sharp appearance. Instead, the robe must be "mixed" by dyeing it in two different colors, usually earth, brown, or gray tones, colors regarded as simple and not attention-seeking.

Specifically, the robe is divided into two parts (dvebhāga, meaning "two parts"), each part dyed in a different color. This ensures that the robe does not become a luxurious or ostentatious object. This rule applies not only to gifts from laypeople but also reflects a profound ethical principle: deliberately withdrawing from material desires and presenting a modest appearance.

This alteration also has legal meaning within the Sangha community: it allows a clear distinction between communal robes, valid according to the Vinaya, and the private robes of bhikkhus.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.