San Lo Bu Pm Pc 68Travelling by Arrangement
Pāli / Sanskrit:Saṁvidhāna
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
EXPLANATION OF THE SAṀVIDHĀNA RULE
Background
The Saṁvidhāna rule belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, specifically the sixty-eighth Pācittiya rule in the Saṅghādisesa collection. The Vinaya Piṭaka was established by the Buddha to regulate the life of the Sangha, protect the purity of those gone forth, and create favorable conditions for the practice of liberation.
The word "saṁvidhāna" in Pāli means "arrangement, organization by agreement." In the disciplinary context, it refers to bhikkhus agreeing together about a travel route. In the Buddha’s time, bhikkhus often had to travel between towns and villages to teach the Dharma, go for alms, and find places for the rains retreat. Group travel required a certain degree of coordination to ensure safety, maintain deportment, and avoid causing inconvenience to donors.
This rule was established when the Buddha observed certain problems arising from inappropriate ways of traveling among bhikkhus, affecting the image of the Sangha in the eyes of laypeople as well as obstructing the monks’ own study and practice.
Main Content
The Saṁvidhāna rule concerns bhikkhus agreeing together to travel, and afterward intentionally acting contrary to the original agreement without a legitimate reason. This is a Pācittiya offense, one of the lighter offenses in the disciplinary system, but it still requires confession before the Sangha.
According to the spirit of the Theravāda Vinaya, when bhikkhus have together agreed on a route or time for travel, suddenly changing one’s intention without informing others or without a legitimate reason is regarded as a lack of trustworthiness and a disruption of harmony in the Sangha. This not only causes inconvenience to the other bhikkhus who have prepared according to the common plan, but may also damage the reputation of the Sangha in the eyes of the people.
However, the Vinaya also clearly states exceptions. If there is an unavoidable circumstance such as illness, danger to life, or an important Dharma-related condition that arises, the bhikkhu may change the route without committing an offense. This shows the flexibility and compassion in the spirit of the Buddha’s establishment of the precepts: the discipline is not a rigid chain but a protective means for practice.
Keeping agreements about travel reflects the virtues of truthfulness (sacca), trust (vissāsa), and respect for the Sangha, core qualities of a Buddhist renunciant.
Practical Meaning
Although the Saṁvidhāna rule may appear to regulate only a technical aspect of travel, it actually contains profound ethical principles that still have meaning for practitioners today.
First, this rule teaches responsibility for one’s words and commitments. In present monastic life, this applies to every agreement among monks, from participating in retreats and schedules of practice to Dharma propagation activities. Keeping one’s promise reflects seriousness in practice and respect for the time and effort of others.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.