San Lo Bi Pn 20Pleasuring Oneself With a Stream of Water
Pāli / Sanskrit:udaka-srota-pratisaṁyuktaṁ
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
DISCOURSE ON TAKING PLEASURE FROM A STREAM OF WATER
Explanation of San Lo Bi Pn 20
Background
This discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the rules that monastics must observe. It reflects specific situations in the daily lives of bhikkhus, male monastics, when the teaching had just begun to spread. The Buddha and the Sangha built principles of action to protect the purity of the teaching and help monastics not be drawn in by small temptations from the world. This discourse is directly related to the issue of restraining the senses and protecting mindfulness in practice.
Main Content
The discourse speaks of the conduct of a bhikkhu who enjoys pleasurable sensation from a stream of water (udaka-srota). Although water should be used for bodily hygiene according to practical need, if a practitioner deliberately prolongs or actively creates such an act solely to enjoy sensual pleasure (kāma-sukha), then that is a mistaken action. In the Vinaya Piṭaka, such conduct is considered a violation of the Pātimokkha, one of the basic rules of the Sangha.
This teaching is based on a core principle of the Buddha Dharma: all sensual actions are a place where suffering (dukkha) arises. Temporary pleasure from the senses is not the goal of practice. Indeed, even small material pleasures can become a doorway leading to slackening of mindfulness, causing the practitioner to deviate from the path of liberation. The Buddha taught that monastics should not seek sensual pleasures, because they are bondage (saṁyojana), not freedom.
Practical Meaning
This discourse is not a condemnation of using water in ordinary life. The key point is awareness and motivation. A bhikkhu may wash the body normally to maintain hygiene, but should not deliberately create or prolong sensual sensation. The boundary between “reasonable need” and “sensual craving” is subtle but very important in practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.