Lzh Sarv Bu Vb Pc 5Teaching Someone of the Opposite Gender Alone
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dhammadesanā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Discourse on Teaching the Dharma to Someone of the Opposite Gender
Background
This discourse is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pācittiya section, the rules concerning actions that bring remorse. The Vinaya Piṭaka is a collection of lessons on ethical conduct and discipline within the monastic community, the Sangha, developed from specific situations encountered by the Buddha.
This discourse arose in the historical context in which the Sangha community was growing and the need to teach the Dharma to followers outside the monastic community was increasing. The question arose: how can a monastic or bhikkhunī teach the Dharma to someone of the opposite gender safely, avoiding conflict or mistrust from the community? This is a practical matter of community governance and the protection of the honor of the fourfold assembly: monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen.
Main Content
The rule in this discourse states that a monastic should not teach the Dharma (dhammadesanā) to a person of the opposite gender in private, without a third person present as witness. If a monastic violates this, it is considered a Pācittiya act, one that brings remorse and must be confessed.
This principle is not because teaching the Dharma is bad. On the contrary, explaining and transmitting the Dharma (dhammadesanā) is considered one of the best actions. However, the context, the presence of a witness, is emphasized. The reason lies in protecting the honor of both teacher and student, as well as protecting the community’s trust in the Sangha.
Furthermore, this regulation reflects the deep understanding of early Buddhism concerning human psychology and latent risks. Although the content of the Dharma is pure, the privacy of a meeting between two people of different genders can lead to misunderstanding, conjecture, or even improper behavior. Therefore, the rule of “having a witness” concerns not only actual conduct but also purity of intention and the transparency of the community of practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.