Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Vb Pc 4Reopening a Legal Issue

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ukkoṭana

📖302 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Background

Ukkoṭana (reopening, requesting reconsideration) is one of the regulations of communal monastic law recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the early tradition. This discourse belongs to the Pācittiya section, that is, offenses requiring simple confession but needing to be made public before the Sangha. The background of this regulation concerns disputes in the monastic community when a legal matter that had already been settled was later proposed by someone to be reopened.

In the development of the Vinaya, the early monks recognized that a monastic community could not function effectively if every legal decision were continually discussed again. Therefore, the rule on ukkoṭana was established to protect the stability and order of the Sangha, while also setting clear conditions regarding time and legitimate reasons for requesting reconsideration of a matter.

Main Content

Ukkoṭana states that a legal matter already decided by the Sangha should not be reopened arbitrarily. However, if there is a legitimate reason and within a certain period of time, a monk may request that the matter be reopened for reconsideration. This reflects an important principle: law must be both stable and fair.

Under Pācittiya, if a monk reopens a legal matter unlawfully, that is, without sufficient conditions or not for a legitimate reason, then he commits a Pācittiya offense. Legitimate conditions for reopening a matter usually include the discovery of new evidence, an error in the original proceedings, or additional information that changes the nature of the matter.

This regulation also emphasizes the importance of assembly and unity in the Sangha. When a decision has been properly passed by the Sangha in accordance with the Dharma, it must be respected. Continual questioning or requests for reconsideration weaken the authority and independence of the Sangha as a self-governing body.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.