Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Sk 24Sit Not Smelling

Pāli / Sanskrit:Sit not smelling

📖1,076 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This item has descriptive information recorded as Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Sk 24, belonging to the Chinese Comparative Vinaya, with the Vietnamese title “Không Ngồi Ngửi Thức Ăn,” the English title “Sit Not Smelling,” and the Pāli title also recorded in English as “Sit not smelling.” The data has no full text, no Chinese text, no complete translation, and no note determining the precise object of the act of “smelling.” Therefore, this explanation is based only on the descriptive information and the truncated end of the Vietnamese text.

It should be noted that the earlier truncated ending spoke much about a “clean dwelling place,” “bad smells,” and concluded with the phrase “Do Not Sit in a Place with a Bad Smell.” This may not fully match the current Vietnamese title, “Do Not Sit Smelling Food.” Therefore, one should not continue to assert that this rule certainly concerns a place with a bad smell. The more reliable data in the data are the Vietnamese and English titles, which indicate that the rule is connected with deportment while sitting and with smelling, very likely in the context of food, though the specific details still need comparison.

Context

The Sk group is commonly understood as rules of training in deportment, that is, small but important rules about how to walk, stand, sit, eat, receive food, interact with laypeople, and live among the assembly. These trainings are not only meant to create outward dignity. They train mindfulness in body, speech, and mind, so that a renunciant does not act out of lax habit, craving, or lack of tact.

The title “Do Not Sit Smelling Food” suggests a very ordinary situation. When food is present, people are easily drawn by fragrance and taste. The act of smelling food, if done conspicuously while sitting, may express craving for flavor, selectiveness, or an attitude of judging the food. In the alms life, food is not an object of enjoyment, but a medicine to sustain the body for practice. Therefore, the way food is received must be accompanied by humility and contentment.

If the old ending spoke of cleanliness of space, it may be understood as an attempt to give a broader interpretation of smell and purity. However, with the present descriptive information, the focus should be placed on deportment related to the smell of food rather than on the hygiene of a dwelling place. Cleanliness remains an important value, but it should not be made the main content of the rule without source confirmation.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the descriptive information, it can be determined that this is Sk rule number 24 in the Chinese comparative Vinaya, and that it is connected with the act of “sitting” together with “smelling.” The Vietnamese title adds the object, “food.” Since the full text is absent, it is not possible to determine whether the prohibited act is intentionally smelling for pleasure, smelling before eating, sitting in what posture, or smelling in the context of receiving food. Nor can the degree of offense, the training formula, or the cases of non-offense be determined.

What is certain in terms of practice is that the rule aims at restraint in deportment. A renunciant is reminded not to let the body display fondness for fragrance and taste. The smell of food often stirs subtle craving: wanting to taste, wanting to choose, wanting a delicious portion, wanting to avoid what is not pleasing. A small action such as bending down to smell can increase the mind of discrimination and make donors feel that the monastic is still heavily attached to good flavors.

The truncated ending mentioned sila and samadhi, that is, discipline and concentration. Although the detail about a place with a bad smell is not certainly correct for this item, the connection between deportment and collectedness of mind can still be retained. When the body is less coarse, the mind can more easily abide; when eating is less driven by craving for taste, contemplation can deepen more readily.

Meaning for Practice

The practical meaning of this rule is the transformation of one’s attitude toward food. In Buddhist learning, one does not eat in order to display preferences, nourish attachment, or make pleasure in taste the goal. One eats to maintain the body, relieve the feeling of hunger and thirst, and have strength to continue practice. Therefore, before food, a practitioner needs dignity: receiving enough, eating mindfully, not excessively praising or criticizing, and not expressing desire through eyes, nose, mouth, or hands.

Not sitting and smelling food is also a profound courtesy toward donors and those eating together. If a renunciant smells food to inspect whether it is good or poor, others may see it as a sign of demandingness. If one smells out of curiosity or habit, the mind is still being drawn by the object of scent. This training helps the practitioner return to simplicity: receive what comes, within proper limits, without letting the nose lead the mind into comparison.

For laypeople, this spirit also has value. In modern life, people are often stimulated by images, fragrances, advertising, and habits of consumption. Learning to pause before food is learning to recognize desire just as it arises. There is no need to despise food, nor to pretend to be austere; one need only eat with gratitude, without letting enjoyment overwhelm mindfulness.

Comparative Notes

The full text at the source should be compared to determine precisely in what situation Sk 24 speaks of “smelling.” In particular, the difference between the Vietnamese title “Do Not Sit Smelling Food” and the old ending, which leans toward “Do Not Sit in a Place with a Bad Smell,” must be checked. If the original confirms that the object is food, the passages interpreting the rule as concerning a place with a bad smell should be removed from the main version. If the original concerns a bad smell or a place to sit, then the Vietnamese title or note should be corrected to avoid deviation in meaning.

The present version does not add persons, origin story, specific words of the Buddha, translator’s name, or canonical location. The ideas about discipline, concentration, purity, and deportment are presented as practical interpretation based on the title and the group of training rules, not as a translation of the original text. When the full source is available, it should be updated with terminology closer to the text.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.