Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Np 11Silk Blanket
Pāli / Sanskrit:Kosiya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This item has descriptive information including the code “Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Np 11,” the tradition “Sectarian Canon · Comparative,” the Chinese Comparative Vinaya collection, the Vietnamese title “Chăn Tơ Lụa,” the English title “Silk Blanket,” the Pali title “Kosiya,” and a source link. The former Vietnamese body text was truncated in a passage discussing silk cloth, luxurious objects, differences of status within the Sangha, and an attitude of non-delight toward requisites that have been offered. Since there is no full source text in the data, it is not possible to determine the exact rule sentence, the establishment context, or the details of handling the object.
What follows is an AI interpretation, not a translation of the original canonical Vinaya text. The content is based only on the title, the item code, the tradition recorded in the descriptive information, and the truncated ending of the Vietnamese text. It does not add names of persons, places, chapters, translators, or comparative sources. What may be said cautiously is that this item relates to the use of a blanket or requisite made of silk, and through this emphasizes the attitude of one gone forth toward valuable material things.
Context
In the life of one gone forth, basic requisites such as robes, blankets, sitting cloths, medicines, and lodging function to support the body so that practice may continue. They are not regarded as means for constructing a luxurious identity, nor as symbols of status. When an object becomes too precious, too beautiful, or too liable to arouse delight, practitioners need special wakefulness. The issue lies not only in the object itself, but in the clinging mind that may arise around it.
The titles “Chăn Tơ Lụa” and “Silk Blanket” show that the subject is an object used for covering, bedding, or warmth that is connected with silk. The old ending says that silk cloth should not be used as personal adornment or to display differences of status within the Sangha. Although the original rule sentence cannot yet be confirmed, this line of interpretation accords with the general spirit of the Vinaya: one gone forth lives in moderation and avoids nourishing subtle desire under the name of comfort.
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
It can be determined with certainty that this item belongs to the Chinese Comparative Vinaya and bears the code “Np 11.” The data does not specifically explain the abbreviation “Np,” so one should not infer too much about the form of penalty. The Vietnamese, English, and Pali titles all suggest silk material or an object made of silk. The remaining ending shows that the earlier interpretation focused on the danger of delighting in luxurious objects, even when such objects are offered with reverence.
What can be stated cautiously is this: practitioners need to regard requisites only as means serving the life of brahmacharya. If a blanket of precious material gives rise to possessiveness, pride, discrimination between superior and inferior, or the wish to receive special care, then the object has gone beyond its simple function. In a community of practice, differences in personal requisites can also create comparison, envy, inferiority, or privilege. Therefore, the discipline sets boundaries to protect both the individual and the Sangha.
It cannot be determined from the descriptive information whether this training rule absolutely forbids all cases involving silk, or forbids only one manner of making, one proportion of material, or one specific purpose of use. Nor can it be stated how the object must be relinquished, handled, or reassigned without the full text. The safe interpretation is to emphasize the spirit of freedom from greed, contentment, equality, and not using precious objects to create prominence.
Meaning for Practice
The meaning for practice in this item lies in recognizing craving in refined forms. Practitioners are not necessarily bound only by great things; sometimes attachment arises from an object that is small but beautiful, soft, precious, rare, or respectfully offered by others. If there is no wakefulness, receiving can turn into indulgence, care can turn into privilege, and a requisite can become a dwelling place for selfhood.
This training rule also reminds us that simplicity is not external poverty, but inward freedom. A contented person does not need inferior objects to prove that one practices, nor precious objects to feel respected. When an object comes, one knows how to use it for its proper purpose; when it does not come, one does not give rise to deprivation. The mind does not chase after material, value, or difference: that is the ease the discipline seeks to protect.
For laypeople, this lesson remains practical. Consumer life often ties human worth to possessions: tools, clothes, houses, vehicles, brands. A Buddhist practitioner may ask: am I using this object because of a need, or because I want to be recognized? Do I suffer when I lack it? Do I regard it as a measure of dignity? Such questions help turn the use of material things into a practice of contemplation. Not every convenience is wrong, but dependence on convenience is something that needs to be illuminated.
Comparative Note
There is not yet a full source text with which to compare the rule “Kosiya” in the Chinese text or related recensions. One should not independently determine details such as the proportion of material, the manner of manufacture, the procedure for handling the object, or the degree of penalty. This interpretation is based only on the descriptive information and the truncated ending, which emphasize silk cloth, a silk blanket, luxury, and the attitude of not clinging to objects that have been offered.
When comparison later becomes possible, it will be necessary to check exactly whether the training rule concerns making anew, using, keeping, or receiving a particular kind of blanket. Until such data is available, this item should be read as a reminder of contentment and care before objects that are capable of nourishing subtle delight.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.