Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Pc 61Leaving Without Giving Consent

Interpretation of Chandaṁadatvāgamana

Leaving Without Giving Consent

Background

This rule belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha rules, the profound training regulations in ethics for the practicing community. Chandaṁadatvāgamana is one of the rules concerning Pācittiya offenses, lesser offenses requiring confession, arising from specific situations when the Buddha and his disciples lived together.

According to the Theravāda tradition, the Vinaya Piṭaka is not merely a set of prohibitions, but rules born to protect harmony within the monastic community (Sangha). Each rule has a foundational story showing why it was necessary. This rule reflects the concern of the Buddha-Dharma for mutual respect and collective responsibility.

Main Content

Chandaṁadatvāgamana states that a monastic should not leave a residence (vihāra) or a practicing group without “chanda,” consent or permission from the community or from the guide. Chanda here is not merely one’s own willingness, but the public asking of permission, expressing respect for the Sangha and for collective connection.

This fault is regarded as Pācittiya because it is not an act evil in its nature, but it violates the principle of discipline and respect for communal structure. If a monastic silently goes away without reporting to anyone, this creates unease, causes concern among fellow practitioners, and weakens trust within the group.

To avoid this offense, a monastic must clearly ask permission before leaving, whether temporarily or for a long time. This includes informing the guide or those responsible, explaining the reason, and receiving approval.

Practical Meaning

This rule teaches that personal freedom and collective responsibility are not contradictory. In the monastic community, each person is part of a larger whole. Leaving without permission is a heedless act or a sign of failing to value those around one, people who may be concerned or may need one’s support.