Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Dh Sk 82Asking for Rice and Curry
Pāli / Sanskrit:Sūpodanaviññatti
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
THE DISCOURSE ON ASKING FOR BRAN AND CURRY
Background
The Sūpodanaviññatti (Asking for Bran and Curry) is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, the regulatory component of the traditional Theravāda Buddhist Tripiṭaka. These disciplinary texts record the rules of conduct and daily life for bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs, in order to maintain the discipline of the monastic community (Sangha) and preserve the Buddha-Dharma over time.
This discourse arose from practical situations during the development of the early Sangha community. As the Buddha-Dharma expanded, the question of how to ask for food, especially bran (milk or porridge) and curry, became something that needed regulation so as to avoid greed, arrogance, or discourtesy in the bhikkhus’ alms-seeking way of life.
The Vinaya Piṭaka records these specific instructions not because of something trifling, but for a profound purpose: preserving spiritual purity through daily bodily, verbal, and mental conduct. Every detail of monastic life is a means of practice.
Main Content
The Discourse on Asking for Bran and Curry stipulates that bhikkhus, when going for alms or receiving food, should not explicitly or too deliberately ask for certain kinds of food. In particular, one should not go to someone’s house and say, “Give me bran,” or “Give me curry,” with an insistent or desirous attitude.
This does not mean that a bhikkhu must starve or refuse food. Rather, this rule teaches easefulness (appatannata), not being difficult, and santuṭṭhi (contentment) with what is offered. A bhikkhu should receive the food provided with gratitude, not with bargaining or demands.
If a bhikkhu violates this rule by requesting food too specifically and in an improper way, he is to be disciplined according to the degree of the offense, from admonition to more serious penalties if necessary. The essential point is that the Sangha governs itself internally in order to maintain the purity and venerability of the monastic body before the lay community.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.