Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Bu Vb Pc 56Living With an Ejected Monastic

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ukkhittasambhoga

📖287 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Ukkhittasambhoga Discourse: Living with an Ejected Monastic

Background

The Ukkhittasambhoga discourse (Pāli: ukkhitta = ejected, sambhoga = living together) is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the basic code of the Sangha. This text regulates prohibited actions within the monastic community, especially in relation to disciplinary decisions and legal consequences within the Sangha.

The background of this discourse arises from specific situations in the history of the early Sangha. When a monastic was formally ejected by the Sangha (ukkhepana), a serious penalty in the disciplinary system of Theravāda Buddhism, the remaining monastics had to observe special regulations in how they dealt with the ejected person. This discourse was established to clarify what was prohibited and what was permitted, in order to avoid confusion or injustice.

Main Content

The Ukkhittasambhoga discourse concerns a basic principle: a monastic ejected from the Sangha is not permitted to live together in the same place with monastics who remain under discipline. This is not only a matter of physical space, but also a matter of legal and spiritual relationship within the community.

The rule clearly specifies prohibited actions when living with an ejected monastic, including: not sharing lodgings, not sharing food, not engaging in bodily contact, and not participating in common religious activities such as chanting, studying Dharma, or sitting meditation together. These regulations are very specific, ranging from details about where to eat to forms of communication.

The rule also distinguishes among different situations: whether the ejected person shows remorse and wishes to reform; whether there are exceptional reasons, such as illness or emergency circumstances, that might allow indirect contact. However, the basic principle remains separation until the Sangha formally removes the act of ejection.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.