Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Bu Vb Pc 4Reopening a Legal Issue

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ukkoṭana

📖297 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Interpretive Rendering of the Ukkoṭana Discourse (Reopening a Legal Issue)

Background

The Ukkoṭana discourse is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pācittiya section, which records training rules and cases concerning dispute resolution in the Sangha. The context of this discourse is occasions when the Sangha needed to review and discuss again legal issues that had already been decided. The word “Ukkoṭana” means “raising up,” “reopening,” or “discussing again,” referring to taking up a matter already concluded in order to examine it once more.

In the time of the Buddha, disputes concerning disciplinary law were decided by local Sangha communities according to certain methods. However, some situations required reviewing an old decision, perhaps because injustice was discovered, new evidence appeared, or there was a deeper understanding of the Dharma. The Ukkoṭana discourse regulates the conditions, procedures, and ethical framework that allow a legal issue to be reopened without violating the principle of order in the Sangha.

Main Content

The Ukkoṭana discourse concerns one of the eight methods for settling disputes (aṭṭha adhikaraṇa samathā) taught by the Buddha to the Sangha. Reopening a legal matter is not an arbitrary act, but must follow strict conditions. First, there must be a valid reason: either an error has been discovered in the previous decision, or new evidence clearly proves injustice. Second, the person proposing the reopening must have a pure intention, directed toward fairness and correct adherence to the Dharma (Dhamma), not toward revenge or disturbance.

The process of reopening must be carried out solemnly, with the confirmation of the Sangha. One cannot arbitrarily reopen a matter again and again or use tricks to humiliate others. If the matter is reopened and carefully reviewed once more, the result must be accepted and respected by the Sangha.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.