Lzh Mu Bu Vb Np 12Pure Black Blanket
Pāli / Sanskrit:Suddhakāla
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Pure Black Blanket (Suddhakāla)
Lzh Mu Bu Vb Np 12 — Comparative Vinaya in Chinese, Sectarian Tradition
---
Source Status
The full source text of this legal item has not yet been directly collated within the scope of accessible materials. The explanation below is not a translation of the original sutta, nor does it reproduce the Buddha’s words verbatim. All content is constructed on the basis of the descriptive information provided, including the tradition name, collection name, sequence number, Vietnamese title, English title, and Pali title, together with a general understanding of Buddhist legal structure in the context of sectarian comparison. Readers and practitioners should consult the original Chinese text or reliable bilingual editions for specialized study.
---
Background
The legal item numbered Lzh Mu Bu Vb Np 12 belongs to the Comparative Vinaya in Chinese, within the group Nissaggiya Pācittiya, often transcribed as Ni-tát-kỳ Ba-dật-đề, that is, the group of precepts related to forfeiture of an object and confession. This type of precept has two components: the offending object must first be given up, and only afterward is the offense confessed and resolved according to the Sangha procedure.
The code Np 12 indicates that this is the twelfth rule in the Nissaggiya Pācittiya group according to the Vinaya system being compared in this collection. The Pali title Suddhakāla (or Suddhakālaka) may be analyzed semantically: suddha means “pure, complete, unmixed”; kāla (or kālaka) means “black, dark.” Joined together, Suddhakāla means “pure black” or “entirely black,” referring to a kind of black wool or pure black material used to make a blanket, mat, or bedding for a bhikkhu.
The Vietnamese title Chăn Đen Thuần Túy accurately reflects the characteristic of the material that is the central object of this rule.
---
Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information
Based on the descriptive information and the nature of the Nissaggiya Pācittiya rules concerning objects, this rule Np 12 is related to regulations on wool used to make blankets or coverings for bhikkhus, especially pure black wool.
In the Buddhist Vinaya system, rules concerning blankets, bedding, and coverings often serve to regulate in two directions: on the one hand, preventing luxury, waste, or accumulation of unnecessary items; on the other hand, prescribing the composition of materials according to certain proportions, for example not using entirely one kind of wool but mixing according to a prescribed ratio, in order to control quality, material value, and the symbolic meaning of simplicity.
The use of pure black wool (suddhakāla) may violate the rule on mixing materials that the Buddhist discipline prescribes for bhikkhus when making articles from animal wool. This places the rule in the broader context of regulations concerning cīvara (robes) and auxiliary requisites in the life of one who has gone forth.
Because this legal item is found in the Chinese comparative collection of sectarian traditions, its content reflects the regulation of one or more ancient Buddhist schools set side by side for comparison. Each school may have slight differences concerning the threshold of offense, the way the object is forfeited, or the sequence of confession, and this comparison is the core scholarly value of the Vinaya collection.
---
Meaning for Practice
From the perspective of practice, a rule in the Nissaggiya Pācittiya group such as Suddhakāla reminds one who has gone forth of the principle of contentment, knowing enough and not seeking objects beyond need or beyond the limits permitted by the Sangha. Pure black wool, if it has greater aesthetic or material value, can all the more easily become an object of subtle craving.
In particular, the two-step structure of this kind of rule, forfeiture of the object first and confession afterward, carries a profound message for practice: one does not merely repent in words, but must take concrete action to cut off the object that caused the offense. This is the practice of counteracting the habit of clinging to possessions, one expression of craving in the daily life of a practitioner.
Furthermore, studying the rules in the Comparative Vinaya helps practitioners and scholars recognize that the spirit of keeping the precepts is not mechanical obedience to a fixed text, but understanding the purpose and depth behind each regulation: protecting the purity of the Sangha, maintaining the faith of laypeople, and nourishing the mind of relinquishment in the one who has gone forth.
---
Comparative Note
Because the original Chinese source text of this legal item has not yet been directly collated, all more specific interpretations of the offending object, the conditions of violation, or the way the object is forfeited need to be verified through the original text. The Pali title Suddhakāla can help guide research in equivalent Vinaya systems of different schools, in order to clarify the content of this rule within the full historical context of Buddhist legal studies.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.