Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Bi Vb Pc 4Reopening a Legal Issue

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ukkoṭana

📖286 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Background

The Ukkoṭana discourse, reopening a legal issue, is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Samantapāsādikā, the detailed legal code for bhikkhus. The Vinaya Piṭaka is one of the three canonical baskets, containing the rules, procedures, and legal principles the Buddha established for the Sangha in order to maintain harmony, discipline, and diligence within the practicing community.

In the formation of the Sangha, disputes and disagreements concerning legal matters of the Sangha were not rare. Therefore, the Buddha taught procedures for resolving these disputes fairly and logically. Ukkoṭana, from the Pāli meaning “reopening” or “raising again,” refers to an important legal procedure: the possibility of reopening a legal issue that has already been settled, or bringing it up for reconsideration when there is new evidence or argument.

Main Content

This discourse teaches the conditions and process for reopening a legal issue in the Sangha. Not just anyone may reopen a decision that has been made; certain lawful conditions must be present. These include the presence of new evidence (avacanīya), legally weighty testimony, or clear errors in the original process of examination.

The Ukkoṭana procedure is applied by presenting a motion (ñatti) before the Sangha. This motion must be presented publicly and clearly, and must have confirmation from bhikkhus considered competent to judge. This process ensures that no decision is permanent if it is not in accordance with the Dharma or if new evidence arises.

The discourse emphasizes that the purpose of reopening a matter is not to create disorder or allow dissatisfied persons to speak groundlessly. Rather, it is a mechanism to ensure legal justice and integrity within the body of the Sangha.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.