Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bu Pm Pc 34Accepting Two or Three Bowls Full

Pāli / Sanskrit:Dvittipattapūrapaṭiggahaṇa

📖308 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Sutta on Accepting Two or Three Bowls Full

Some Remarks on the Moderation of the Sangha

Background

This sutta appears in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha section of the Theravāda tradition. The Vinaya Pitaka is a collection of rules and directives intended to regulate the collective life of monks and nuns, helping to preserve the teaching and maintain internal discipline.

During the Buddha's lifetime, bhikkhus had to live by alms round, going from house to house to request food from faithful laypeople. However, subtle issues concerning the course of action and refinement in receiving offerings became complex. The detailed regulations established by the Buddha were meant to protect the purity of the Sangha and avoid behaviors that could invite criticism or loss of trust from the community.

Main Content

The sutta "Accepting Two or Three Bowls Full" (Dvittipattapūrapaṭiggahaṇa) concerns whether a bhikkhu is permitted to accept more than one bowl of food from one household. Specifically, the issue raised is: when a layperson offers two or three full bowls of food to a bhikkhu, is this in accord with the Dharma?

According to the rule recorded in the Vinaya Pitaka, a bhikkhu should accept only one bowl of food from each household, except in certain specially permitted cases. Accepting too much may reflect greed, or cause other laypeople to feel that it is unfair. This is also related to the principle of "accordance with the Dharma" (dhammaṭṭhiti), meaning that actions must accord with the spirit and purpose of the Buddha Dharma.

The rule states that if a layperson voluntarily offers more, the bhikkhu should find a reasonable way to decline tactfully, or accept only if there are valid reasons, such as illness or other cases allowed in the Vinaya. The goal is to maintain propriety, simplicity, and freedom from causing burden.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.