Lzh Dg Bu Pm Pc 21Instruction
Pāli / Sanskrit:Ovāda
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Instruction (Ovāda)
Comparative Vinaya — Chinese · Lzh Dg Bu Pm Pc 21
---
Source Status
The text item numbered Lzh Dg Bu Pm Pc 21 belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese corpus, in the tradition of Sectarian Canonical Texts · Comparative. This is a provision in the Pācittiya section of the Vinaya for bhikkhus, recorded through the Chinese comparative system among Buddhist schools. The original full text of this provision has not yet been directly and fully collated in the database being used. Therefore, the explanation below is based only on the information determinable from the provided descriptive information, together with basic knowledge of the structure of the Sectarian Vinaya. Readers and practitioners should refer directly to the original Vinaya texts for an accurate basis for study and practice.
---
Background
The Comparative Vinaya — Chinese is a work of both scholarly and practical character, intended to compare in parallel the disciplinary provisions among several different Buddhist schools transmitted through Chinese texts. In the history of the transmission of the Dharma, major schools such as the Dharmaguptaka, Sarvāstivāda, Mahīśāsaka, Mahāsāṃghika, and several others each had their own Vinaya systems translated into Chinese in the early centuries of the Common Era. Comparing these systems helps clarify the fundamental consistency of the discipline as well as the historical and geographical differences among the traditions.
Provision Pc 21 belongs to the Pācittiya section, the group of rules involving a lighter form of confession than the grave categories such as Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa. In the system of the Bhikkhu Prātimokṣa, the Pācittiya rules generally include a considerable number of provisions regulating conduct, mutual relations, and limits in the communal life of the Sangha. The title "Ovāda," meaning Instruction or admonitory teaching, suggests a scope of regulation related to teaching, advising, or transmitting the Dharma among members of the Sangha.
---
Content Determinable from the Descriptive Information
From the title Ovāda (Instruction), this provision can be identified in general terms as concerning the act of giving instruction within the Sangha. In the Pāli Vinaya, the term ovāda refers to the act of a bhikkhu teaching, reminding, or advising another, especially between bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs. Some Vinaya systems clearly regulate the conditions, scope, and limits under which a bhikkhu may or may not give instruction to bhikkhunīs, or the conditions required for him to be formally authorized by the Sangha before performing that act of instruction.
Specifically, in many Sectarian Vinaya traditions, there is a Pācittiya provision stating that a bhikkhu may not give instruction on his own initiative to bhikkhunīs without being appointed or permitted by the Sangha. If he violates this, that is, if he gives ovāda by himself without proper authorization, that bhikkhu incurs a Pācittiya offense and must confess before the Sangha. However, because the full text of provision Lzh Dg Bu Pm Pc 21 has not been directly confirmed, any more detailed interpretation of the object of application, specific circumstances, and form of confession must be carefully verified from the primary text.
---
Meaning for Practice and Study
The provision on Ovāda, regardless of school, reflects a deep principle in the spirit of Buddhist discipline: instruction must arise from virtue, authority, and proper authorization by the Sangha community, not merely from personal will or private zeal. This is a twofold protection: it protects the one being instructed from uncontrolled influence, and at the same time protects the bhikkhu giving instruction from pride, overstepping his role, or abusing his position.
In modern life of study and practice, the spirit of this provision reminds practitioners that true teaching must be accompanied by responsibility, humility, and recognition by the community. A true teacher needs not only knowledge, but also the trust of the Sangha and corresponding ethical character. This rule also reflects how the Buddha organized the Sangha as a self-governing collective, in which every important action, including the act of teaching, has a communal character and accountability.
---
Comparative Note
Because the full text of provision Lzh Dg Bu Pm Pc 21 has not yet been directly collated, all content in this explanation is only for reference and orientation. Researchers should compare it with the extant Chinese Vinaya texts, as well as bilingual comparative Sectarian texts if available, in order to verify the exact content of the provision, including the explanation of the context of offense, exceptional cases, and the corresponding form of expiation in each compared Sectarian tradition.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.