Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bu Pc 7979. Criticizing a legitimate legal procedure

Pāli / Sanskrit:Kammapaṭibāhana

📖319 words · ~1 min read
2
Summary

A monk who has given his consent for the Order to perform an official act, but then criticizes the act, must confess the offense.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Sutta Bu Pc 79: Not Criticizing a Legitimate Decision of the Sangha

Background

Bu Pc 79 (Kammapaṭibāhana) belongs to the Vinaya of the Theravāda tradition, forming part of the monastic code (Bhikkhunī Pāṭimokkha). This rule was established by the Blessed One to protect the integrity and unity of the Sangha.

In Theravāda Buddhism, when the Sangha must address matters relating to discipline, the Dhamma, or communal property, its members are required to carry out formal legal acts (kamma) according to prescribed procedure. Such a procedure requires the consent, or at least the silence, of qualified members. Bu Pc 79 concerns the case of a monastic who initially approves a legitimate decision of the Sangha but subsequently criticizes that act openly.

Principal Content

According to the rule set forth in this sutta, if a bhikkhunī (or, analogously, a bhikkhu) has participated in a formal act of the Sangha—whether by explicitly consenting to or by remaining silent in acceptance of a legal act (kamma)—and then publicly speaks out to criticize, censure, or impugn the validity of that decision, such a person has committed an offense (Pācittiya). This offense is neither a grave offense (Pārājika) nor a serious offense (Saṅghādisesa), but is rather a lighter offense requiring confession before the Sangha.

An important distinction is to be noted: if the person had expressed opposition from the outset and maintained that position throughout the proceedings, no offense is committed. However, if one initially agreed or remained silent and thereafter turned against the decision, this constitutes an act of inconsistency that undermines the unity of the Sangha.

This rule emphasizes the principle that once a decision has been formally and legitimately passed, members are bound to respect it. If there is disagreement, it must be expressed before the decision is enacted—not raised through covert criticism afterward.

Practical Significance

Bu Pc 79 teaches monastics an important lesson in honesty and accountability.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.