Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bu Ay 11. Sitting with a woman in a concealed place

Pāli / Sanskrit:Paṭhamaaniyata

📖295 words · ~1 min read
2
Summary

A female lay disciple may see a monk sitting in a secluded place with a woman. If she accuses him of an offense entailing expulsion, suspension, or confession, and he admits to the offense, then he incurs an offense accordingly.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of Paṭhamaaniyata (The First Undetermined Rule)

Background

Paṭhamaaniyata is the first rule in the Aniyata (Undetermined) section of the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition. This section belongs to the Bhikkhu Vibhaṅga, the code of training for monks (bhikkhu). The context in which this rule arose records situations from the early period of the Buddhist community, when the Buddha established regulations to protect the purity of the Sangha, particularly with regard to interactions between monks and women.

In the sixth century before the Common Era, as new monastics were entering the order, many issues concerning the morality and reputation of the Sangha arose. The Paṭhamaaniyata was established as a clear guideline for maintaining discipline and the trust of the laity toward practitioners.

Main Content

According to the text, the situation in question occurs when a laywoman (upāsikā) witnesses a monk (bhikkhu) sitting alone with a woman in a concealed place. The word "paṭhama" means "first" or "most evident," referring to the most clear-cut instance of a potential offense.

This laywoman has the right to acknowledge or report the monk concerning offenses that may have arisen from that act. These offenses are classified into three levels: first, offenses entailing Pārājika (transgressions leading to expulsion from the Sangha); second, offenses entailing Saṅghādisesa (transgressions requiring formal acknowledgment before the Sangha); and third, offenses entailing Pācittiya (minor transgressions requiring individual confession).

The crucial point is this: if the monk acknowledges a wrongdoing, he must bear the consequences corresponding to the level of the offense. This rule does not depend on intention or additional evidence; the monk's own acknowledgment is the determining factor.

Practical Significance

The Paṭhamaaniyata is not merely an administrative regulation. It reflects a profound principle of the Buddha-Dharma: personal accountability and transparency.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.