Mnd 8Exposition of the Discourse to Pasūra on Debate
Pāli / Sanskrit:Pasūrasuttaniddesa
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Exposition of the Discourse to Pasūra on Debate (Pasūrasuttaniddesa)
Background
The Pasūrasuttaniddesa (Analysis of the Discourse Spoken to Pasūra) is recorded in the Khuddaka Nikāya of the Pāli Canon, within the Niddesa — detailed commentaries on the shorter discourses. This work is not the original discourse itself but rather an analytical exposition, employing the method of corresponding exegesis (sannaya) to examine a teaching related to Pasūra.
Pasūra is the name of an individual — possibly a scholar or a student of the Buddha's teaching who wished to understand clearly the nature of debate and argumentation within the Dhamma. The precise historical circumstances are not recorded in detail, but from the structure of the Niddesa it may be inferred that this discourse was intended to explain to those who wished to master the method of correct debate according to the standards of the Buddha's Teaching — not debate for the sake of victory or the defense of self.
Principal Content
This discourse focuses on the analysis (niddesa) of the constituent factors of debate (vāda, kathā) from the perspective of Theravāda Buddhism. The Niddesa employs techniques of lexical and conceptual explanation in order to illuminate the deeper meaning of the canonical text.
Within the context of Theravāda Buddhism, debate is not a matter of winning or losing, nor of defending one's own views, but rather a process of investigating truth (sacca). This discourse points out that a wholesome debate must be grounded in the Noble Eightfold Path (Ariyo aṭṭhaṅgiko maggo), in particular right intention (sammāsaṅkappo) and right speech (sammāvācā).
The analytical exposition may address such important points as: how to avoid erroneous modes of debate (micchā); how to use language with precision; and how to observe the principles of the Vinaya when participating in debate within the Sangha.
Practical Significance
The practical significance of this discourse lies in its teaching of ethically grounded debate (sīla). For those who cultivate the Buddha's Teaching, it serves as a reminder that even when engaging in discussions of the Dhamma, one must uphold the five fundamental precepts, and refrain from false speech, idle chatter, and divisive speech.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.