Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Khuddaka Nikāya — The Minor Collection

Mnd 12Exposition of the Shorter Discourse on Arguments

Pāli / Sanskrit:Cūḷabyūhasuttaniddesa

📖320 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of the Shorter Discourse on Arguments

(Cūḷabyūhasuttaniddesa - Mnd 12)

Background

The Cūḷabyūhasuttaniddesa is found within the Niddesa of the Khuddaka Nikāya, one of the most important collections of scriptures in the Pāli Canon of the Theravāda tradition. Niddesa means "exposition" or "elaboration" — these are detailed discourses on shorter suttas, intended to illuminate the deeper meaning of the Dhamma.

This text is the detailed exposition of the "Cūḷabyūhasutta" (the Shorter Discourse on Arguments), a sutta of a disputational and polemical character. During the time of the Buddha, when disciples gathered together to discuss the Dhamma, debates (vivāda) frequently arose. In order to help the Sangha understand how to handle such disputes wisely, the Buddha taught about the various kinds of arguments, proofs, and proper modes of reasoning.

Principal Contents

The Cūḷabyūhasuttaniddesa focuses on the analysis of methods of debate and argumentation within the context of Buddhist practice. The text elaborates on how a bhikkhu or scholar ought to employ what has been stated, what has been inferred, rules of grammar, analogies, evidence, and valid reasoning in order to defend or teach the Dhamma.

The heart of the text is the teaching on three kinds of arguments: yathāsutaṁ (what has been heard from the scriptures), takkahetupariyāyena (what is established through logical reasoning), and attapaṭisaṁvedā (what has been personally realized through one's own direct experience). The text emphasizes that when debating the Dhamma, practitioners should rest upon these three foundations rather than relying solely upon emotion or personal bias.

The teaching further points out that a wise person should know how to distinguish between valid and invalid arguments. Futile disputes — such as quarreling over matters not directly related to the reduction of suffering or to the attainment of Nirvana — are regarded as a waste of effort and energy. This is why the Buddha encouraged his disciples to focus upon questions of genuine practical significance.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.