Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Mahāyāna — Northern Canon · Tengyur — Treatises

Toh 4416Untitled

📖298 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of Toh 4416 — A Treatise from the Northern Canonical Tradition

Context

This scripture belongs to the treatise collection (Abhidharmakośa-bhāṣya) of the Northern Canonical tradition, an important part of the Tengyur—the collection of commentaries, treatises, and materials for practicing the Buddha’s Dharma translated from Sanskrit into Tibetan during the later translation period, from the twelfth to the fifteenth centuries. Toh 4416 is one of the explanatory treatises, namely, commentaries that elucidate difficult passages in the scriptures to help Mahāyāna practitioners gain a profound understanding of Dharma theory, particularly the nature of dharmas and how they function.

The Mahāyāna tradition, particularly the Northern Canonical lineage of Tibetan Vajrayāna Buddhism, esteems these works because they provide a profound theoretical foundation for spiritual practice, connecting intellectual understanding (prajñapti) with meditative cultivation (bhāvanā).

Main Content

Although the descriptive information does not provide a specific title, judging by the position of Toh 4416 within the Tengyur, this scripture may be one of the explanatory treatises on fundamental subjects of Mahāyāna Abhidharma, such as the analysis of dharmas, the nature of mind (citta), mental factors (caitasika), or their interaction in the process of spiritual practice.

The typical structure of these works includes: (1) an explanation of the theory of dharmas according to the Yogācāra tradition or other Mahāyāna schools; (2) an analysis of the nature of cognition and the interaction between the object (ālambana) and cognitive representation (vijñapti); and (3) guidance on applying these theories to the process of cultivation and realization.

The explanatory treatises in the Tengyur generally employ rigorous logical methods, illustrative examples, and step-by-step arguments to clarify abstract concepts. They place particular emphasis on transcending distinctions among dharmas in order to reach an understanding of the nature of suchness (tathatā)—the unborn and unceasing reality of all phenomena.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: Pending translation by 84000.co · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.