Toh 3913Untitled
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Exposition of Toh 3913 — A Treatise from the Tibetan Canon
Context
This text appears in the Tengyur (Bstan 'gyur), the Treatise Collection of the Tibetan Canon, one of the largest bodies of Buddhist literature in the Northern Mahayana tradition. The Tengyur includes explanatory treatises by Indian masters on the Buddhist scriptures, translated into Tibetan from the eighth through the twelfth centuries. The Treatise Collection, in which Toh 3913 is found, represents the profound development of Buddhist thought through the works of renowned masters such as Nagarjuna, Vasubandhu, Dignaga, and Candrakirti.
Toh 3913 reflects the intellectual context of the Northern Tibetan Mahayana tradition, in which the relationship between conceptual designation (prajñapti) and ultimate reality (paramārtha) is comprehensively investigated. This was a period when Buddhist exegetes concentrated on profoundly analyzing the nature of mind, phenomena, and emptiness (śūnyatā) through logical reasoning and the mind-only teaching (vijñaptimātra).
Main Content
Although the specific title of Toh 3913 has not been fully translated or transliterated in the descriptive information, this text commonly addresses central Mahayana concerns: the nature of the Buddha-element (buddhadhātu), the bodhisattva path, or a penetrating analysis of phenomena and consciousness. Works from this period of the Treatise Collection often explore the relationship between mind and its environment (ālaya-vijñāna), the relationship between phenomena and reality, and practical methods of cultivation.
According to the Yogācāra and Madhyamaka traditions—the two principal branches of Northern Mahayana—this text may explain that all phenomena are products of mind and conceptual determination (adhyavasāya), while lacking any independent intrinsic nature (niḥsvabhāva). This understanding is not abstract philosophy but the foundation for liberation from craving and ignorance (avidyā).
Practical Significance
To apply this treatise to contemporary practice, practitioners must understand that the distinction between mind and phenomena is not absolute.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.