Toh 3770Untitled
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of Scripture Toh 3770 — Northern Tibetan Mahayana Tradition
Context
Scripture Toh 3770 belongs to the Treatise Piṭaka (Abhidharma Piṭaka) of the Tengyur, the collection of Buddhist commentaries compiled and translated into Tibetan under the reign of King Trisong Detsen (eighth to ninth century). The Northern Tibetan Mahayana tradition, especially through schools such as Gelug, Nyingma, and Sakya, reveres the Treatise Piṭaka as an inseparable component of the three piṭakas: Scripture, Vinaya, and Treatise.
The works in the Tengyur are largely commentaries and developments of teachings from the scriptures, composed by great Indian masters such as Asaṅga, Vasubandhu, Dharmakīrti, and others. They are not original scriptures preached by the Buddha, but profound explanations that help students clearly understand the subtle meaning of the Dharma.
The absence of a specific title for this scripture suggests that it may be part of a larger treatise, or a separate entry in the Tengyur classification system. This does not diminish its value in the process of study and practice.
Main Content
Although the detailed content has not yet been fully translated in the descriptive information, according to the context of the Mahayana Treatise Piṭaka, works such as Toh 3770 often focus on core issues such as: (1) the nature of phenomena (dharmatā), (2) the relationship between mind and objects (citta-viṣaya), (3) the way of distinguishing kinds of knowledge and cognition, or (4) the development of the bodhisattva mind.
In the Northern Tibetan tradition, especially the Cittamātra, or Mind-Only School, treatises often explore the “unreal” nature (śūnyatā) of the distinction between subject and object, and the method of practice that leads to direct cognition of suchness (bhūtatathātā). These passages may be related to methods for analyzing action, result, and the causes and conditions of arising.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.