Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Mahāyāna — Northern Canon · Tengyur — Treatises

Toh 3716Untitled

📖320 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of Toh 3716 — Northern Tibetan Transmission

Context

Toh 3716 is a treatise belonging to the Tengyur — the collection of Buddhist Dharma commentaries in the Northern Tibetan Mahayana tradition (Tibetan Buddhism). This Treatise Collection was composed by learned Buddhist teachers of ancient India and later translated into Tibetan during the period when Buddhism developed in Tibet (approximately the 8th to 11th centuries).

In the Northern Tibetan Mahayana tradition, the Tengyur plays an extremely important role — it is the collection of treatises that explain the Sutra Collection (Kangyur), helping devotees understand the Buddha’s teachings more deeply. These treatises are not only theoretical commentaries, but also direct practical guides for cultivation, suited to the disposition of Mahayana students.

Although the title of the work Toh 3716 has not been fully recorded in the available descriptive information, according to the arrangement of the Tengyur it belongs to one of the core topics of the Mahayana: it may concern the bodhisattva path, mind (Cittamātra), or aspects of practice free from clinging to mind.

Main Content

The treatises in the Tengyur usually follow a rigorous logical structure, beginning with the presentation of opposing views (pūrvapakṣa), and then systematically establishing Mahayana theses. This scripture, like other treatises in the Toh 3700-3900 range (a range devoted to treatises on mind and Madhyamaka), is likely to enter deeply into complex philosophical issues concerning the nature of mind, lack of intrinsic nature (śūnyatā), or the relationship between cognition and object.

For Mahayana scholars, such a treatise would tend to demonstrate that all phenomena are empty of independent essence, and that practicing the bodhisattva path is not the accumulation of material things or any other entity, but the cultivation and purification of perfect wisdom.

The sequential structure of a Tengyur treatise often includes: (1) Setting forth the issue from the scriptures; (2) Analyzing different viewpoints; (3) Establishing a proven conclusion through logic and reasoning.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: Pending translation by 84000.co · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.