Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Mahāyāna — Northern Canon · Tengyur — Treatises

Toh 3476Untitled

📖310 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of the Toh 3476 Scripture — Tengyur Treatise Canon

Context

This scripture is a component of the Treatise Canon (Tengyur) — the largest collection in the Northern Transmission Canon, consisting of explanations of the Buddha Dharma composed by bodhisattvas and Indian masters after the time of the Buddha. Toh 3476 is found in the Treatise Canon translated and preserved in Tibet, reflecting profound Mahayana doctrine, especially in the traditions of the Madhyamaka and Yogācāra schools.

The Tengyur contains more than 3,600 scriptures and treatises, translated mainly from Sanskrit during the great translation period from the 8th to the 12th centuries. The work of the Inti Foundation in collecting and preserving these scriptures and treatises aims to maintain the original Buddha Dharma tradition, providing scholars and practitioners who awaken with a precious body of material for deeply understanding Mahayana thought.

Main Content

The Toh 3476 scripture belongs to the category of Mahayana philosophical commentaries, focusing on fundamental issues of the Dharma. Although the standard title has not been fully provided, based on its position in the Tengyur, this scripture may be related to themes such as the nature of mind (citta), the concept of emptiness (śūnyatā), or aspects of the Bodhisattva path (Bodhisattva mārga).

Commentaries in the Tengyur commonly elaborate profound points of Dharma through rigorous logical reasoning and set forth principles from major Mahayana scriptures such as the Avataṃsaka Sūtra or the Prajñāpāramitā Scriptures. They not only explain meaning, but also critique mistaken views in order to protect the integrity of the Buddha’s words.

This scripture and treatise, like other works in the Tengyur, is constructed according to the method of logical debate (pramāṇa) — using reasoning, examples (udāharaṇa), and demonstration to clarify questions of the Dharma. Bodhisattvas and Indian Buddhist scholars used this tool to help practitioners overcome doubt (saṃśaya) and attain clear understanding (parijñāna).

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: Pending translation by 84000.co · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.