Toh 3101-2Untitled
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of Scripture Number Toh 3101-2 from the Tengyur
Context
This scripture belongs to the Treatise Collection (Abhidharmakośa) in the Tengyur, a collection of treatises serving the deep understanding of the Buddhist Dharma according to the Northern Transmission Tibetan Mahayana tradition. The Tengyur is the Tibetan compilation of commentaries and explanations of the teachings, translated from Sanskrit and Chinese, recording the wisdom of learned bodhisattvas and of Vasubandhu, the great author of the Abhidharmakoṣa.
The purpose of the Tengyur is to illuminate abstract concepts in the Sutra Collection (Sūtra), address questions of logic, metaphysics, and practical cultivation. Scripture number Toh 3101-2 lies within the category of treatises that analyze the basic elements of existence (dharma), regarded as the “kernels” of reality from which consciousness and matter are constituted.
Main Content
According to the Northern Transmission Tibetan Mahayana tradition, this scripture explains the principle of non-self (anātman) and cause and effect (karma) through the lens of the dharmadhātu. Vasubandhu’s Treatise Collection conducts a detailed analysis of material elements (rūpa), mind (citta), and unconditioned elements (asaṃskṛta dharma) in order to show that there is no “unchanging entity” in any phenomenon.
In the Mahayana context, the dharmadhātu is understood not as an empty space, but as an infinite network of causal interrelations: all dharmas are related and mutually supportive. This scripture differs from Hinayana treatises in that it recognizes Buddha-nature as innate in all sentient beings, and the goal of practice is not only arhat suchness but the bodhisattva path directed toward buddhahood.
The Treatise Collection also addresses disputed debates among Buddhist schools, especially between the Sarvāstivāda school, which holds that all dharmas exist, and the Sautrāntika school, which holds that only what is directly perceived truly exists. Through rigorous analyses, Vasubandhu presents a moderate position, allowing practices of cultivation to have a firm foundation in knowledge.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.