Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Mahāyāna — Northern Canon · Tengyur — Treatises

Toh 2632Untitled

📖288 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

An Explanation of Treatise Collection Toh 2632

From the Northern Tibetan Mahayana Tradition

Context

This scripture is part of the Tengyur, the Tibetan treatise collection, which gathers commentaries and treatises translated from Sanskrit into Tibetan under King Songtsän Gampo and in subsequent periods, from the seventh to the twelfth centuries. Toh 2632 is an exegetical work belonging to the Northern Tibetan Mahayana tradition, reflecting the profound interaction between Indian Buddhist learning and the Tibetan philosophical foundation.

In this context, “treatises” (śāstra) are not scriptures directly taught by the Buddha himself, but works by teachers of the Dharma lineage (ācārya), masters of deep practice who taught the Dharma again to help students understand the Buddha’s intended meaning. The Tengyur includes more than 3,600 such works, forming the foundation for Tibetan Buddhist doctrine and practice over roughly three centuries.

Toh 2632 is arranged and preserved according to the strict classification system of the Northern canon, where each scripture is assigned its own number for ease of access and verification.

Main Content

Although the title has not been fully identified, this treatise is directed toward clarifying a central aspect of Mahayana Buddha-Dharma. In the Northern Tibetan tradition, such treatises often discuss topics such as the nature of Buddha-nature, the bodhisattva path of practice (Bodhisattva-yāna), or aspects of Cittamātra and Madhyamaka, the two main philosophical schools.

The spirit of the treatises in the Tengyur is to harmonize rational logic with Dharma practice. They do not merely argue, but also indicate how to practice in order to attain realization. The author of Toh 2632 likely sought to explain clearly a difficult principle or restate a teaching in order to untangle confusion for virtuous people following the path of enlightenment.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: Pending translation by 84000.co · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.