Toh 1998Untitled
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
An Exposition of Toh 1998 from the Tengyur — The Treatise Collection
Background
This scripture belongs to the Tengyur (bstan ’gyur), the collection of treatises in the Northern Buddhist Canon of the Mahayana tradition. It was compiled and preserved by Buddhist scholars from India and Tibet during the translation of scriptures from approximately the seventh to the thirteenth centuries. The Tengyur is a collection of treatises, commentaries, and works explaining the scriptures, and is regarded as an indispensable supplement for a profound understanding of the Buddhadharma.
The Northern Buddhist Canon, or the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, developed through the integration of the Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions. In this tradition, treatises are regarded as guiding threads that help practitioners more clearly understand the profound principles contained in the scriptures, particularly those concerning Buddha-nature, emptiness, and the path of practice leading to awakening.
Although the title of this scripture has not yet been fully translated, its position in the Treatise Collection (Toh 1998) suggests that it is a work by an Indian master of old, possibly concerning central Mahayana themes such as the nature of Buddha-nature, the doctrine of emptiness (Śūnyatā), or skillful means (Upāya) in the teachings.
Main Content
Within the Tengyur, works commonly explore the philosophical dimensions of the Buddhadharma in depth. In keeping with the Northern Buddhist tradition, these works often focus on logical analysis, the refutation of mistaken views, and the establishment of a correct understanding of fundamental principles.
Whereas in the scriptures of the Kangyur the Buddha presents these principles directly through narratives and teachings, in the treatises the masters of old employ logic and dialectical reasoning (rigs pa) to elucidate their deeper meanings.
Toh 1998 likely explains an important aspect of the Mahayana teachings—perhaps concerning:
Impermanence (Anicca) and how it is connected with the Buddha-nature latent within all sentient beings; or the correspondence between phenomena (
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.