Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Mahāyāna — Northern Canon · Mahāyāna Treatises

Triṃśikā — Thirty Verses on Mind-Only

📖862 words · ~3 min read
2
Summary

Vasubandhu — 30 essential verses on Mind-Only.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Triṃśikā — Thirty Verses on Mind-Only: AI Exposition (Inti Dharma)

Note: This is a scholarly exposition synthesized by AI from descriptive information; it is not a translation of the original scripture. The complete Sanskrit source and Chinese translations have not been directly collated in this system.

---

Source Status

The complete text of the Triṃśikā-vijñaptimātratā (Thirty Verses on Mind-Only) has not yet been directly collated in the current Inti Dharma database. This exposition is constructed purely from the provided descriptive information, including the Vietnamese title, English title, the author Vasubandhu, and the short description “30 essential verses on Mind-Only.” Readers who wish to undertake specialized study should directly consult the Sanskrit original or the Chinese translations still transmitted today.

All details regarding the structure of the verses, the order of presentation, and the specific exegesis given below are presented at a general level, reflecting broad scholarly understanding of this text in Buddhist studies, and should not be regarded as quotations from the original text.

---

Background

Thirty Verses on Mind-Only is one of the most important works of the master Vasubandhu, one of the most eminent great commentators of Mahayana Buddhism, who lived around the fourth to fifth century CE. Vasubandhu is known for an immense body of work across two phases of thought: the Sarvāstivāda phase and the Mahayana Yogācāra phase, the latter showing a profound philosophical transformation under the influence of his elder brother, the master Asaṅga.

This text belongs to the Mahayana Treatise Piṭaka, that is, the treatise collection (śāstra) of the Northern tradition, which preserves systematic works of commentary on philosophical and meditative issues in the Mahayana. Unlike scriptures (sūtra) framed as direct teachings of the Buddha, the treatise collection is the product of reflection and synthesis by commentators, intended to systematize, clarify, and develop principles already established by the scriptures.

The Thirty Verses was composed in the form of verses (kārikā), a concise form of Buddhist literature that contains dense philosophical thought within each short line. This was also a common style in the Indian tradition, helping students memorize the text easily and transmit it across generations. According to tradition, Vasubandhu passed away before completing his own auto-commentary, making the Thirty Verses the object of later commentaries by many Yogācāra scholars and giving rise to a rich exegetical tradition.

---

Contents Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

From the descriptive information confirming that this is 30 essential verses on Mind-Only (Vijñaptimātratā, only representations or expressions of mind, with no independent entity outside mind), the core themes that Buddhist scholarship recognizes as being contained in this text can be identified:

Regarding general structure: The text consists of 30 verses, understood as presenting the Yogācāra philosophical system in a concise and comprehensive manner.

Regarding the theme of consciousness: At the center of the text is the doctrine of Mind-Only (Vijñaptimātratā), the thesis that everything experienced is a manifestation of consciousness, with no material world or self existing independently outside consciousness. This does not mean denying the appearance of objects, but denying their independent and truly existent nature.

Regarding the system of eight consciousnesses: Yogācāra analyzes consciousness into eight levels, among which ālaya-consciousness (ālayavijñāna, foundational consciousness, storehouse consciousness) plays the key role as the repository of all karmic seeds. Alongside it is manas (Manas), the psychological level whose function is continuous grasping at self, and the six ordinary consciousnesses: eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mental consciousness.

Regarding the three natures: Yogācāra distinguishes three natures (trisvabhāva): the imagined nature, created by discriminating attachment; the other-dependent nature, arising interdependently through conditions; and the perfected nature, the absolutely true nature. This is Yogācāra’s distinctive ontological analytic framework.

---

Meaning for Study and Practice

Thirty Verses on Mind-Only is not merely a rational philosophical document, but also a map of practice. When the practitioner understands that consciousness itself, with its mechanisms of self-grasping and discrimination, is the root of suffering and saṃsāra, the entire path of liberation is reoriented toward the transformation of the basis (āśrayaparāvṛtti): from a state of consciousness marked by ignorance and self-grasping toward the awakened state in which the eight consciousnesses are transformed into the four pure wisdoms.

For practitioners, this text invites thorough inward contemplation: instead of seeking the causes of suffering in the external world, the practitioner learns to recognize that the mind’s own mechanisms of grasping and discrimination are the source that constructs the whole field of experience. This is the path of yogācāra meditation: the path of the practitioner (yogin) who enters deeply into the nature of mind.

Reading and studying the Thirty Verses requires patience and a firm foundation in Mahayana doctrine. Students should combine textual study with meditative contemplation and should consult traditional commentaries in order to understand each verse correctly within the complete context of Yogācāra thought.

---

Collation Note

The complete text of the Triṃśikā has not been directly collated in the Inti Dharma system. This exposition is based entirely on the provided descriptive information and on general knowledge of the text’s position within the Yogācāra tradition; serious researchers should consult the original text and scholarly commentaries directly in order to establish reliable grounds for comparison.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC-BY-4.0 (84000.co) / open-source · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.