Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Kd 5Leather

Pāli / Sanskrit:Camma

📖312 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Camma Discourse (Old Mu Kd 5) — The Section on Leather

Background

The Camma discourse in the Vinaya Piṭaka reflects an important stage in the early monastic community, when bhikkhus did not yet have a fully developed system of training regarding the proper use of monastic requisites. This passage, specifically concerning leather, records the moment when the Buddha issued concrete regulations to guide the ascetic life of his disciples. The context reflects a situation in which bhikkhus used materials such as leather in an improper way, leading to disputes and complaints from laypeople and other monastics.

The Vinaya Piṭaka is the collection that sets forth principles for governing the Sangha, the Buddha’s measures for maintaining discipline, purity, and lawful practice. Matters that seem minor, such as leather or monastic requisites, contain deep principles concerning mindfulness and contentment, the understanding of sufficiency.

Main Content

The leather section of the Camma discourse records that at first bhikkhus were permitted to use leather without any conditions. However, when harmful consequences arose, such as backwardness, trade, accumulation of possessions, or disputes over ownership, the Buddha made a ruling and established restrictions.

Specifically, the Buddha instructed that bhikkhus may use leather only for the most necessary purposes: as a belt, to protect the hands and feet, or for other essential implements. The use of leather must follow the spirit of “requisite” (paccaya), that is, using only what is necessary to maintain health and the capacity for practice. If it exceeds what is necessary, it becomes a form of accumulating possessions, contradicting the noble principle of fewness of wishes (appicchā).

The Buddha’s measure is very clear: a bhikkhu should not regard requisites as his own, and should not delight in silk coverings or luxurious details. Leather is regarded as a tool, not as a precious commodity or a means of displaying status.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.