Xct Mu Bu Pm Pc 53Obstructing a Legal Procedure
Pāli / Sanskrit:Kammapaṭibāhana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Sutta on Obstructing a Sangha Procedure (Kammapaṭibāhana)
Background
This sutta is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda canon, in the Pācittiya section, concerning lesser offenses that require confession. It is a rule prescribed by the Buddha to protect the purity of the monastic community and to ensure that Sangha procedures (kamma) are carried out properly and transparently.
Sangha procedures (kamma) are important communal decisions performed by the assembly of monastics to administer the Dharma, judge violations of the discipline, or regulate matters concerning common life. These decisions must be carried out according to proper procedure in order to have legal validity within the community. Obstructing or causing obstruction to such a process is not only an undisciplined act, but also a disruption of the unity and order of the Sangha.
Main Content
According to Kammapaṭibāhana, a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī who intentionally conceals, destroys, or obstructs any aspect of a legitimate Sangha procedure commits a Pācittiya offense. This includes actions such as preventing a qualified bhikkhu from participating in the procedure, destroying evidence, presenting false information, or creating obstacles in order to invalidate the decision of the Sangha.
This rule reflects the principle that unity and transparency are the foundation of the Buddhist community. An unobstructed Sangha procedure is one carried out with the witness and consent of the entire monastic community, and therefore it has genuine binding force and legal validity. When a monastic intentionally obstructs it, they not only violate the discipline but also infringe upon the communal principle (saṅghika, belonging to the Sangha).
The degree of this offense depends on intention (cetanā) and the extent of obstruction. If the action is intentional and produces a result, the act is regarded as Pācittiya: a lesser offense requiring public confession before the Sangha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.