Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Pm Np 10Excessive Prompting for Robe Funds

Pāli / Sanskrit:Rāja

📖291 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the "Rāja" Discourse (Excessive Need for Robe Funds)

Background

This discourse is recorded in the Pāli Canon, specifically in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Early tradition. These are legal regulations established by the Buddha Gotama to govern the communal life of the bhikkhu Sangha, in order to protect the financial independence and dignity of the Saṅgha jewel.

In the historical context, early monastics depended on the offerings of laypeople to obtain robes (uttarāsaṅga). However, when this need exceeded what was necessary, or when monastics repeatedly reminded and pressured laypeople to provide robe funds, this created ethical difficulties and placed an unnecessary burden on the lay community. Therefore, the Buddha laid down specific rules to control this conduct.

Main Content

The specific content of this discourse has not yet been fully translated in the present descriptive information system. However, based on the context of the Early Vinaya Piṭaka, this rule revolves around the act of "excessive need for robe funds" (atireka parikkhāra), that is, repeated and improper requests by monastics for laypeople to provide financial support for the requisites of practice.

According to the principle of the Vinaya, a monastic may properly receive a robe offering from laypeople, but should not actively "prompt" (sallapana) or "ask excessively" (paramparā-yācana). The Buddha earnestly taught that monastics must restrain themselves, always maintaining the spirit of alms-dependence and not depending excessively on material things. If a monastic continually reminds laypeople of his need for a robe, whether that need is legitimate or not, this conduct violates the principle of contentment with little and few requests (atta-paṭilābha - self-sufficiency with little asking).

Practical Meaning

This disciplinary discourse carries profound meaning concerning financial self-restraint and personal ethics within the community of practice.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.