Xct Mu Bi Pc 129Dancing
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dancing
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Dancing Discourse
From the Vinaya Piṭaka — Theravāda Tradition
Background
The Dancing discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, especially in the Pātimokkha section, the basic code governing the life of monks and nuns. It is not a doctrinal discourse, but a disciplinary regulation arising from a specific situation in the monastic community during the time of the Buddha Śākyamuni.
According to the Theravāda tradition, the Buddha established rules (Vinaya) not to constrain, but to protect the purity of the Sangha, help monastics preserve their reputation, avoid activities that could diminish people’s respect, and create favorable conditions for mental practice.
Main Content
The Dancing discourse belongs to the category of actions not in accord with discipline (dhamma vikati), specifically conduct that monastics should avoid because it can disturb concentration or negatively affect the image of the Sangha in the eyes of the community.
Dancing, performing movements of entertainment, is regarded as unsuitable to the nature of the renunciant life. This is not because the body of a monastic is evil or contemptible, but because dancing movements are often connected with desire, attention to appearance, and activities that arouse craving. This is contrary to the principal purpose of going forth: to transcend activities connected with greed, hatred, and delusion.
This rule also reflects respect for others. When a monastic dances for entertainment, it is an act that may diminish the respect people hold for the Sangha, thereby making it difficult to propagate the Dharma and create faith in Buddhism.
Practical Meaning
This discourse is not meant to condemn the body or natural movement. Rather, it teaches that every action of a monastic should be carried out with mindfulness (sati), right view (sammā diṭṭhi), and the purpose of moving toward liberation. The body is an instrument for practice, not an object for display or entertainment.
In the modern context, the meaning of this discourse is not outdated.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.