Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bi Pm Pc 3Malicious Talebearing

Pāli / Sanskrit:Pesuñña

📖319 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Sutta on Malicious Speech (Pesuñña)

From the Pāli Vinaya

Background

The Sutta on Malicious Speech (Pesuñña) belongs to the Pātimokkha, the collection of basic rules that bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs must observe. In the traditional Theravāda Vinaya, this is one of the violations defined among the Pācittiya offenses, faults requiring confession, one of the seven classes of offenses according to severity.

Pesuñña, a Pāli term meaning “slander” or “ill will in speech,” is understood more broadly as malicious speech intended to create discord and division between individuals or within a community. This is a mental and verbal action forbidden in the Buddha’s Teaching, because it directly opposes the Four Immeasurables of loving-kindness, compassion, appreciative joy, and equanimity, as well as the principle of karma.

This Pācittiya rule number 3 is recorded in the context of the early community of monks and nuns, when the Buddha saw the negative consequences of malicious speech for harmony and shared progress in practice.

Main Content

According to the Theravāda tradition, the violation of malicious speech is defined as repeating words spoken by another, whether true or false, with the intention of creating discord. The important distinction between “malicious speech” (pesuñña) and other verbal faults such as false speech (musāvāda) or harsh speech (pharusa-vācā) lies in malicious intention and the divisive consequence (bheda-karaṇa-sampadā).

This rule does not forbid repeating true words if the purpose is to clarify a matter or support reconciliation. However, if a bhikkhu deliberately repeats another’s words with the wish to create conflict, even if the words are true, it is still considered a Pācittiya offense.

The text details that a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī who commits this fault must make public confession before the Sangha or before a competent bhikkhu. This is the process of sincere acknowledgment of wrongdoing.

Practical Meaning

The teaching on malicious speech in Theravāda practice is not only a formal disciplinary rule.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.