Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bi Pm Pc 120Not Following Preceptor for 6 Years

Pāli / Sanskrit:Not following preceptor for 6 years

📖288 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Sutta on Not Following the Preceptor for Six Years

Background

This sutta is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, in the Pācittiya section, rules requiring confession if violated. It reflects a specific situation that occurred in the early Sangha during the Buddha’s lifetime, concerning the relationship between a student (nissaya) and a guiding teacher (ācariya or preceptor).

The historical context shows that the Buddha was deeply concerned with systematic cultivation and the structure of guidance in the Sangha. A newly ordained monk or bhikkhunī needed a guide to be taught the Dharma and Vinaya, methods of practice, and the conduct of one gone forth. The preceptor is not merely the one who confers ordination, but a spiritual teacher responsible for instructing the student throughout the course of training.

The situation addressed by the sutta is that of a student not following the guidance of the teacher for six years, a considerable period of time. This is not a small matter, because it reflects a breakdown in the teacher-student relationship, one of the important pillars of Buddhist training.

Main Content

This rule states that if a monk or nun does not follow the guidance of their preceptor for six years, this is considered a pācittiya violation, a fault requiring confession before the Sangha. Pācittiya is not the gravest offense, such as pārājika or saṅghādisesa, but it is still a significant fault, showing lack of respect and discipline.

“Not following” (apatthaddha) in this context means not listening, not obeying, or actively disregarding the teachings and guidance of the preceptor. This is a violation of the basic ethical relationship. The six-year period mentioned shows that this is not a temporary oversight, but a firmly established attitude lacking humility.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.