Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mg Bu Vb Sk 64–65Sekhiya 64–65

Pāli / Sanskrit:Sekhiya 64–65

📖855 words · ~3 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Sekhiya 64–65 — Comparative Vinaya in Chinese

AI Exposition · Inti Dharma | Tradition: Sectarian Canonical Texts · Comparative

---

Source Status

This scriptural entry belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese collection, bearing the reference Lzh Mg Bu Vb Sk 64–65, corresponding to Sekhiya rules 64–65 in the Bhikkhu Vinaya. The original Chinese source text for this entry has not been directly collated in the system's current database. Accordingly, the presentation below is neither a translation of the original scripture nor a faithful reproduction of the source wording.

The content has been constructed entirely on the basis of the supplied descriptive information, combined with general knowledge of the position and nature of the Sekhiya rules within the Buddhist Vinaya tradition, and is intended to serve the purposes of introduction and orientation for research — not to replace consultation of the original canonical text.

---

Background

Within the Buddhist Vinaya, the Sekhiya rules (Chinese: 衆學法; Vietnamese transliteration: Chúng Học Pháp) comprise a collection of training rules concerning the proper deportment, bearing, and conduct of monastics in the activities of daily life. The Pāli word Sekhiya literally means "that which is to be learned, that which is to be practiced," implying that these are rules not merely prohibitive in character but also educational, emphasizing the practitioner's continuous cultivation.

The Comparative Vinaya — Chinese collection within the Sectarian Canonical Comparative tradition is a scholarly work comparing Vinaya texts belonging to various different schools, preserved in Classical Chinese. These Chinese Vinaya texts reflect the traditions of numerous ancient Indian Buddhist schools, each of which may have a different number of Sekhiya rules and may express their content in ways that are not entirely uniform. This is precisely why the comparative study of Vinaya texts across sectarian traditions holds high scholarly value, helping to clarify points of similarity and difference in how early Buddhist monastic communities understood and applied the rules of deportment.

---

Content Determinable from Descriptive Information

The descriptive information identifies this as Sekhiya 64–65, that is, two consecutive training rules within the Sekhiya section of the Bhikkhu Vinaya (Tỳ-kheo Giới), preserved in the Chinese Vinaya used for sectarian comparison. The reference Lzh Mg Bu Vb Sk indicates that this belongs to the portion of the Pātimokkha designated for bhikkhus (Bu = Bhikkhu), within the Vibhaṅga subdivision (Vb — the analytical section of the precepts), specifically the Sekhiya group (Sk).

The Sekhiya rules ordinarily include regulations on deportment such as: the manner of wearing robes, the manner of receiving food, the manner of eating and drinking, the manner of teaching the Dharma, conduct while walking in the presence of lay supporters, and so forth. Rules 64 and 65, falling toward the latter portion of the Sekhiya group (in many Vinaya texts the number of Sekhiya rules ranges from approximately 75 to over 100 depending on the school), typically concern rules regarding conduct while teaching the Dharma or one's attitude toward those who listen to the Dharma.

However, since the full source text is not available for collation, this cannot be stated with certainty for this particular Chinese text. Readers are encouraged to consult the corresponding original Chinese canonical text directly in order to determine the precise content of these two training rules.

---

Significance for Practice

Even though the specific content of Sekhiya 64–65 in this Chinese text has not been verified in full, the general spirit of the Sekhiya rules continues to carry profound and practical lessons for spiritual cultivation.

First, the Sekhiya rules remind monastics that the deportment of body and mind is a direct expression of inner purity. A practitioner who is genuinely cultivating will naturally manifest composure, dignity, and mindfulness in every small gesture of daily life.

Second, the study and practice of the Sekhiya rules nourish the mind of moral shame and moral dread (hirī and ottappa) — knowing shame before what is wrong and knowing fear before transgression — and these constitute the essential foundation for guarding the life of precept and wisdom.

Third, in the context of sectarian comparison, studying the Sekhiya rules across multiple Vinaya texts enables practitioners and scholars to recognize that the spirit of the precepts is more important than the letter of the rule, and that diversity in the forms of expression does not contradict the unity of the goal of liberation.

Fourth, for lay practitioners, the Sekhiya rules of the Vinaya are also a valuable point of reference for gaining a clearer understanding of the monastic ideal of proper deportment, thereby giving rise to reverence for the Three Jewels and nurturing wholesome roots in one's own daily life.

---

Collation Notes

Since the full Chinese source text of the entry Lzh Mg Bu Vb Sk 64–65 has not been directly collated, all specific details concerning the circumstances of application, the forms of transgression, or the particular commentarial explanations of these two Sekhiya rules 64–65 are not reproduced in this AI exposition. Serious researchers should consult the corresponding Chinese text directly within the sectarian Vinaya archives in order to have a sound scholarly basis when discussing these two training rules.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.